Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:52:04 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Dennis Berger <db@nipsi.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zpool does not work Message-ID: <86ve9r3ptn.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4700E97A.1040704@nipsi.de> (db@nipsi.de's message of "Mon\, 01 Oct 2007 14\:35\:06 %2B0200") References: <4700A791.6020606@encephalon.de> <20071001091106.GB35764@garage.freebsd.pl> <4700BC65.1000303@encephalon.de> <4700BE80.5080109@encephalon.de> <4700C441.30100@nipsi.de> <861wcf82p3.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4700E97A.1040704@nipsi.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dennis Berger <db@nipsi.de> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > Both patches in the PR are incorrect. The second patch is better than > > the first, but still gets the logic wrong and completely misses the > > point of using an sbuf in the first place. > I meant this one > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?prp=3D104389-3-diff "still gets the logic wrong and completely misses the point of using an sbuf in the first place" DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ve9r3ptn.fsf>