Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:14:05 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Roman V. Palagin" <romanp@wuppy.rcs.ru> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 'tee' firewall action Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990329091217.13619B-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.SK%2BPRV.9903291833510.79365-100000@room101.wuppy.rcs.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Unfortunatly the 'tee' option is quite a bit more complicated than it looks.this is because teh normal way that packets get to divert sockets and the way it'd have to get there from a 'tee' are kinda incompatible. It can be done but it's just not quite as straight forward as it first appears.. julian On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Roman V. Palagin wrote: > Hello! > > What the status of 'tee' action? Anybody working on it? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Roman V. Palagin | RVP1-6BONE, RP40-RIPE | Network Administrator > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990329091217.13619B-100000>