Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 12:36:55 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org, peter@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_lock.c Message-ID: <199703260436.MAA12069@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Mar 1997 10:17:59 %2B1100." <199703252317.KAA16029@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Modified: sys/kern kern_lock.c
> > Log:
> > Add missing $Id$
> > Note; the RCS file has also been reconstructed to have a CSRG vendor branc
h.
>
> How was it reconstructed?
>
> Bruce
It was done by creating a temporary repository, 'cvs import'ing the two
Lite2 files correctly, then checking out each version of the ones in the
real cvs tree and committing them one by one in the temp repository. The
result was that the version numbers had changed (1.1 becomes 1.2 etc).
Then I Risked The Wrath Of Polstra and uploaded the new rcs files to
freefall and swapped them for the ncvs ones. Then, immediately check that
cvsup wasn't going to report me for excessively bad behavior. :-)
The result should be pretty much the same as before, the edit history was
maintained. And John Polstra hasn't come hunting me down yet, so it can't
have been too bad. :-)
I wasn't sure whether it was legal to create files under 1.1.1 when rev
1.1 already exists.
Cheers,
-Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703260436.MAA12069>