Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:07:35 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/gpart Makefile distinfo ports/sysutils/gpart/files patch-ae patch-af Message-ID: <20110317070735.GA50416@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201103170003.p2H03lCu061081@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201103170003.p2H03lCu061081@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03:47AM +0000, Matthias Andree wrote: > mandree 2011-03-17 00:03:47 UTC > > Modified files: > sysutils/gpart Makefile distinfo > Added files: > sysutils/gpart/files patch-ae patch-af > Log: > First round of amd64 fixes. Compiles and detects BSD partitions, but > may require work for NTFS, NTFS5, or other partitions. [...] > > Revision Changes Path > 1.16 +7 -6 ports/sysutils/gpart/Makefile > 1.9 +0 -1 ports/sysutils/gpart/distinfo > 1.1 +34 -0 ports/sysutils/gpart/files/patch-ae (new) > 1.1 +96 -0 ports/sysutils/gpart/files/patch-af (new) Perhaps you could explain why did you decide to go with legacy patch naming scheme when it is clearly advised to be avoided by PH? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110317070735.GA50416>