Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:03:54 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@mass.dis.org Subject: Re: NFS Patch #4 -- survived overnight test. (was Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re:...)) Message-ID: <200112131903.fBDJ3sq70413@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011213134619.66101H-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Hmm. I'm OK with a commit to -CURRENT, but would really appreciate it if
:you made it a week before MFC to -STABLE. Given your statement just a few
:lines earlier about needing more review from VM types, that would allow a
:bit more time for necessary review. I agree, given the impending 4.5
:release, we should MFC it as far before release as possible, but three
:days is a little below my threshold for sensitive NFS/file system changes
::-).
:
:Thanks,
:
:Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
I can hold-off the vm_page_set_validclean() patch for a week but there
is no reason not to 3-day MFC the rest of the bug fixes.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112131903.fBDJ3sq70413>