Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:26:01 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: "Gary W. Swearingen" <underway@comcast.net> Cc: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> Subject: Re: To the Armchair Directors Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403152251070.29913-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <7dd67dbgwa.67d@mail.comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > To paraphrase: Users should not bother developers with comments on > FreeBSD development. Users don't deserve to be heard and developers > don't need the comments anyway. Users who violate this rule should be > given a good flaming about pissing off programmers and making unworthy > demands and with a patronizing analogy about diners and chefs. > > I'm sure we all got HIS point, but you seem to have missed MY points > -- that this is a piss-poor way to deal with users and the situation > should (sic) be improved in several ways: If you feel that I missed your points -- which is what I was really *trying* to address, even if my fingers didn't say so -- I apologize. That what specifically why I sent that email. > First, users should be expected to want to voice their opinions about > FreeBSD development and should be given a FreeBSD forum in which to > do so. (I've seen this same situation even on chat@.) Well, chat@ is an anything-goes zone that IMHO is an much less friendly place than even -current. So I wouldn't recommend that. Have you tried -hacker and if so, what were your results there? (I subscribe to neither). > Second, if freebsd-current isn't the forum, the list's documentation > should say so in a polite but clear manner Perhaps, indeed, the charter should be amended to restrict it to very specific discussion, rather than more general ones. > Third, developers should (sic) not flame users for trying to help, > even if they are no help; it does more harm than good. The non-help > should just be ignored or a polite reference to the list docs should > be sent to the offender (only). I have absolutely no argument with this. In fact, I have been known to take developers to task for this very thing -- but generally in private email, under the theory of "praise in public, criticize in private". On occasion, out of anger, I'll criticize another developer in public -- and whenever I do it, if I don't cancel the posting in time, then I myself just become a further part of the overall problem, which is not what I want. At the risk of repeating myself, the reason why I replied to your posting, as well as any number of postings in the most-recent 'future of FreeBSD' thread, is an attempt to bridge this user vs. developer gap. It's very frustrating to attempt to do that, and then read: > (And I could expand on [these reasons] to explain why I've > pretty-much stopped even bothering developers with what they > claim to want, here and in the PR database. If you don't want to use these two options -- especially the latter -- then what would you suggest as an approriate way? I am not asking to bait you: I really have no clue how to resolve this problem from here. Perhaps we really do need some separate list such as freebsd-users or something similar. What would you suggest for its charter? How can your concerns, and those of others, best be addressed? mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0403152251070.29913-100000>