Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:17:18 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        eugen@kuzbass.ru
Cc:        freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: usb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 6630 mobile phone does notwork
Message-ID:  <20070925.231718.-423889040.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070925.231043.-345497328.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20070925.125124.74698669.imp@bsdimp.com> <46F9DC89.598B7C64@kuzbass.ru> <20070925.231043.-345497328.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20070925.231043.-345497328.imp@bsdimp.com>
            "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: In message: <46F9DC89.598B7C64@kuzbass.ru>
:             Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> writes:
: : Warner Losh wrote:
: : > 
: : > Have you tried porting -current's umodem driver back to stable?  I
: : > think it would work a lot better...
: : 
: : I've glanced at CURRENT's umodem and there is no that code
: : allowing to work with devices without CM descriptor using UNION instead...
: : NetBSD has that code since 2005.
: :
: : Do you think CURRENT's umodem would be useble in this case?
: 
: My modem doesn't have a CM descriptor and I quirked it before.  I
: removed the quirk code and it works now without it.  The Union code
: from NetBSD didn't look relevant at all when you chased down all the
: things that it actually did, but maybe I missed something.
: 
: Given that umodem from current should just work on -stable w/o any
: changes (you may need ucom too, which does need one or two changes),
: it would be worth a shot at trying it.

If that doesn't work, btw, I'll port the union code over.

Warner




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070925.231718.-423889040.imp>