Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:27:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy for removing working code Message-ID: <4C93CF16.9080607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <slrni96cbf.1ctl.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> References: <opviol28ky17d6mn@nuclight> <20100908073019.GA16493@lonesome.com> <slrni8eq8q.2h26.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> <4C89107A.6050802@DataIX.net> <slrni96cbf.1ctl.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/17/2010 2:14 AM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > You either not understanding that this situation is about entire project (not > ISDN, but policy) I think at this point that you've made your concerns clear. What you don't seem to be understanding is: 1) The policy is, and always has been, those who are interested in keeping code alive work on it. 2) No one was interested (by the definition above) in keeping the ISDN code alive. Now you have raised a valid point on how we can do the "volunteers needed" notifications better in the future, and I think that those will be taken to heart, and acted on the next time we face this situation. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C93CF16.9080607>