Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:24:45 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
Cc:        "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, dillon@FreeBSD.ORG, fs@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Vinum stripe size (was: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server)
Message-ID:  <20010328102445.C92853@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <200103280040.f2S0eSc03825@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:40:27AM %2B0100
References:  <grog@lemis.com> <200103280040.f2S0eSc03825@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001 at  1:40:27 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at  9:39:36 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
>>>>> [Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
>>>>> This box averages 30.0 load with no problems.]
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Average file size is about 4K.  /home/bbsusers* is on a vinum
>>>>> stripe'd volume with 3 Ultra160 9G 10000RPM drives on sym0 at stripe
>>>>> size 256K,  Greg: I know this should be a prime number,
>>>>
>>>> No, there's no requirement for it to be a prime number.  The only
>>>> problem is that with 32 MB cylinder groups and a power of two stripe
>>>> size and subdisk count, you end up with all the superblocks on one
>>>> subdisk, which is a performance issue.  Choose the stripe size so that
>>>> the superblocks are roughly evenly distributed.
>>>
>>> A performance issue ?  Surely you've misspelt ``reliability'' ?
>>
>> I don't see a reliability issue here.
>
> I believe the only issue with having all your superblocks on one disk
> is a reliability thing - if you lose the disk you lose your
> superblock(s). 

Ah.  Lose part of your file system and you lose your file system.
Vinum has other ways of making up for that problem.

> Surely the only performance problem would be that of locality - if
> you use the partition a bit, that ``problem'' should go away though.

No, under normal circumstances all metadata updates would go to the
same disk, since they're just behind the superblock.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010328102445.C92853>