Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:42:51 -0600 From: "Rick C. Petty" <rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com> To: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> Cc: Alec Kloss <alec@setfilepointer.com>, freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net>, Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> Subject: Re: OpenAFS on FreeBSD Progress (Works) Message-ID: <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com> In-Reply-To: <DC87E29101195307B372C4F5@c-3157e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> References: <493ACAC4.5020806@linuxbox.com> <12501719@bb.ipt.ru> <493D898C.1030609@linuxbox.com> <22B6C509EF7C4AB0A2D8350C31BB8D5D@valentine> <57098597@bb.ipt.ru> <26695644@bb.ipt.ru> <DC87E29101195307B372C4F5@c-3157e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:34:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > >Replying to myself. Seems I found out why this port may be needed: > >Both server and client have common files (i.e. should be marked > >as have CONFLICTS and can't be installed with each other). > > You don't need a meta port, you a client and a server port, and let the > client install all common files, and let the server depend on the client, > which is reasonable anyway. I think you have that backwards. The client contains a kernel module. The server is all run in userland. I think in this case, have the client depend upon the server and have the server install all common files. I agree that there should not be a metaport. -- Rick C. Petty
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081213004251.GA88954>