Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:45 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option Message-ID: <5118D1B5.9070409@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <51166019.9040104@mu.org> References: <201301221511.02496.jhb@freebsd.org> <50FF06AD.402@networx.ch> <061B4EA5-6A93-48A0-A269-C2C3A3C7E77C@lakerest.net> <201302060746.43736.jhb@freebsd.org> <511292C9.4040307@mu.org> <E6BF2B74-175F-49D9-B480-8941294D2E19@neville-neil.com> <51166019.9040104@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09.02.2013 15:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > However, the end result must be far different than what has occurred so far. > > If the code was deemed unacceptable for general inclusion, then we must find a way to provide a > light framework to accomplish the needs of the community member. We've got pluggable congestion control modules thanks to lstewart. You can implement any non-standard congestion control method by adding your own module. They can be compiled into the kernel or loaded as KLD. I consider implementing this as a CC module the correct approach instead of adding yet another sysctl. Doing a CC module like this is very easy. -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5118D1B5.9070409>