Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:37:20 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Mike Pritchard <mpp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man5 fstab.5 Message-ID: <86ir0xc45r.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200801261303.m0QD3af2093786@repoman.freebsd.org> (Mike Pritchard's message of "Sat\, 26 Jan 2008 13\:03\:36 %2B0000 \(UTC\)") References: <200801261303.m0QD3af2093786@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Pritchard <mpp@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Log: > Explain how the passno field in /etc/fstab works with fsck > and quotacheck in some more detail. One thing that isn't entirely clear: how do fsck and quotacheck behave for passno > 1? I get the impression (both from the man page and from previous mailing list discussions) that all file systems with a passno above 1 are treated equally, rather than being ranked by their passno. This is highly undesirable on systems that use labels instead of disk / slice / partition names, since fsck and quotacheck will think all the file systems are on different drives, when in fact they may all be on the same drive. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ir0xc45r.fsf>