Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com>
Cc:        threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: About the kse signal process
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306301216050.20122-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030630154618.93274.qmail@web80511.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> --- Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   I am wondering that the following piece of code
> > > can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it
> > with
> > > 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I
> > > send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it
> > should
> > > be received by the thr_func() only, and print a
> > prompt
> > > msg on the console.
> > 
> > Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm.
> This is the issue. Nothing printed on the console when
> I sent the signal SIGALRM, it meant that none of the
> thread received this signal.

It works for me with both libc_r and libkse.  This is from
a very recent -current.  I can't test under 5.1-release.
There have been some changes lately with regard to signals
in -current and libkse.  I don't know about libc_r...

--
Dan Eischen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10306301216050.20122-100000>