Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:17:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About the kse signal process Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306301216050.20122-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030630154618.93274.qmail@web80511.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote: > --- Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I am wondering that the following piece of code > > > can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it > > with > > > 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I > > > send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it > > should > > > be received by the thr_func() only, and print a > > prompt > > > msg on the console. > > > > Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm. > This is the issue. Nothing printed on the console when > I sent the signal SIGALRM, it meant that none of the > thread received this signal. It works for me with both libc_r and libkse. This is from a very recent -current. I can't test under 5.1-release. There have been some changes lately with regard to signals in -current and libkse. I don't know about libc_r... -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10306301216050.20122-100000>