Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:04:19 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7 Message-ID: <4EA74073.7070206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVcNsK0Q8GbJPZbFv7W9QoWP2%2B=Bgp1EFnZg6sJyQXNbzw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111020114844.GK59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <20111020122121.GL59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <201110211636.05917.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111025140000.GA8559@albert.catwhisker.org> <CAG=rPVdS%2BPOJqATw7kmb0%2Bb9byp3r2Vp8o=ELRFj9K7rA1zpYA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA71713.3020404@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVcABO=L7Wnzb_8nDb7367CQ6j8PyF-sHC4ra4TfJQ4paQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EA721F2.3010804@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVcNsK0Q8GbJPZbFv7W9QoWP2%2B=Bgp1EFnZg6sJyQXNbzw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/25/2011 14:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Doug Barton >> Actually hex would still work since 0x.... would match. :) > > Yes, but if in the future, a revision number format is ever chosen > that doesn't include > 0x at the beginning, and is something like: > a23728ea7d592acc69b36875a482cdf3fd5c8d > > then this check would fail. However, none of this > exists yet in SVN, so it is not worth worry about > right now. Yes, that was what the smiley at the end of my sentence above was intending to convey. Sorry I wasn't more clear. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA74073.7070206>