Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:11:12 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@webweaving.org> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing List <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: With feature freeze being in place Message-ID: <00Jan24.111112est.115220@border.alcanet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20000122210136.B18600@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from asmodai@wxs.nl on Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 07:03:10AM %2B1100 References: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001212322080.2237-100000@localhost> <20000122210136.B18600@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2000-Jan-23 07:03:10 +1100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> wrote: >Also, are GENERIC and LINT in sync? Comparing LINT and GENERIC is made more difficult by the significantly different ordering. Is there some good reason for this, or would an offer of GENERIC re-written into the same order as LINT be accepted? Also, what is the best approach to submitting documentation for the `undocumented' options in LINT? send-pr for each option seems excessive (and the resultant diffs would be a pain to generate or apply except in the original order). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00Jan24.111112est.115220>