Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:19 +0200 From: Buki <dev@null.cz> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: Tom McLaughlin <tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org>, jhs@berklix.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@tower.berklix.net> Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons Message-ID: <20070516152319.GG378@dev.null.cz> In-Reply-To: <86d5125fxo.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200705101342.l4ADgCgg007728@lurza.secnetix.de> <m2vef0n14o.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20070510221221.GA44910@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <464392EC.5090203@elischer.org> <20070510223739.GA66016@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <4643C90D.9040906@elischer.org> <20070511015204.GA66910@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <1178935327.1786.6.camel@localhost> <200705151030.l4FAUbEE063594@fire.jhs.private> <86d5125fxo.fsf@dwp.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 04:17:55PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@tower.berklix.net> writes: > > Someone asked whether lukemftpd offered functionality other(s) don't ? > > What about proxy ? > > > > I've never been sure which ftpd to run on my gateway (with IPFW, with no NAT) > > to provide proxy, so internal hosts could cd /usr/ports; make fetch > > You don't need a proxy. Do the following on each internal host: > > # echo 'FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES' >>/etc/profile actually, if the internal hosts use RFC1918 addresses this wouldn't suffice. He really needs either ftp proxy (and redirect all ftp traffic to it) or NAT. > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav - des@des.no Buki -- PGP public key: http://dev.null.cz/buki.asc /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML & Outlook Mail / \ http://www.thebackrow.net [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGSyHnPzhIkpLLm08RAs4TAJ4luy/xEYQ+ItQ/E6yhQJl9PamDaACgiHi6 gUack3rt9OYSpNDvfwtVdhw= =AD3N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070516152319.GG378>