Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:37:55 +0530 From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com> To: Mayank Kumar <mayank@microsoft.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the following scenario? Message-ID: <84dead720511241007g44770cabufbb1f51bd9927572@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3A5384BC2FBA4C488865F2275A036BFF040B269C@APS-MSG-01.southpacific.corp.microsoft.com> References: <3A5384BC2FBA4C488865F2275A036BFF040B269C@APS-MSG-01.southpacific.corp.microsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Now if there is no process p2 to read the data written by > process p1 from the same localsocket, then this has resulted > in a huge memory leak on a FreeBSD system. How are you measuring the 'leak', and which version of FreeBSD are you using? -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84dead720511241007g44770cabufbb1f51bd9927572>