Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 21:10:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf param.c src/sys/kern uipc_domain.c uipc_proto.c uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c uipc_usrreq.c src/sys/ Message-ID: <199805170110.VAA10280@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <19980517003024.49844@follo.net> References: <19980516200156.30364@follo.net> <199805162159.OAA13568@usr02.primenet.com> <19980517003024.49844@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 17 May 1998 00:30:24 +0200, Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> said: > Can't see that that makes things much different. I'd say this is why having > to allocate things in the bottom half of the kernel is annoying. "Got to > roll with the punch" etc. A rewrite of the socket layer which delayed creation of the new socket until the user process had a chance to run accept(2) (or woke up during a select/poll) would be a good thing. (However, such a change would result in a significant semantic difference for accept() -- not necessarily a bad thing.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805170110.VAA10280>