Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf Message-ID: <199808290040.RAA20897@apollo.backplane.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
:
:Erm, actually, I believe there was all sorts of objection to this one.
:
:Just leave make.conf alone and try and stick to the non-contraversial
:stuff for awhile; you've stubbed enough toes this week for a start. :)
:
:- Jordan
Well, if we can't come to a consensus for something as trivial and
simple as make.conf, I don't hold out much hope being able to submit
other fixes and improvements. I don't particularly want to go through
100 emails back and forth for every single thing I submit... I just don't
have that sort of time. So make.conf is a test, of sorts.
Frankly, I don't see why people are so vapid about simply checking for
a make.conf.local. I would like to do that and go on to other more
important things, like the icmp-error rate-limiting patch to protect
against random-SYN/spoofed network attacks.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet
Communications
<dillon@backplane.com> (Please include original email in any response)
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808290040.RAA20897>