Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 13:56:03 -0400 (EDT) From: jtb <jtb@pubnix.org> To: ben@rosengart.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: non-executable stack? Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980620135432.24819C-100000@pubnix.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980620135039.3890A-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm very sorry, I seem to have misread his post, and I would like to
apologize.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Jonathan T. Bowie ADM w00w00 WSD
jobe@sekurity.org jtb@pubnix.org jobe@dataforce.net
Independant Security Developer
Home: (603)436-5698 "I'd hate to advocate drugs, sex, alcohol, or
Cell: (603)553-6697 violence... to any one, but they've worked
for me." -- Hunter S. Thompson
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Snob Art Genre wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, jtb wrote:
>
> > It could just be me, but why are we discussing solaris 2.6 kernel options
> > on the FreeBSD security mailing list, if anyone wants to discuss teh
> > potential of instituting a similar patch in FreeBSD I'm all ears, but I
> > still don't see how discussing solaris kernel options has anything to do
> > with FreeBSD security.
>
> The message to which you responded mentioned the Solaris option and
> discussed the possibility of implementing something similar in FreeBSD,
> and what the interface to use it should be. It seem completely on topic
> to me, I don't understand your objection.
>
>
> Ben
>
> "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.980620135432.24819C-100000>