Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201636090.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <201206201348.q5KDm2u3045621@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201206201348.q5KDm2u3045621@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > They could be reduced by a combo. of eg: > - forcible unsub, & black list, > - block of anon. remailer domains > - making this list "subscribtion required before posting". > (which would make it harder for newbies fresh to > FreeBSD, but we need some solution) > > I suggest others too should complain to <postmaster@freebsd.org> > appending offenders bad postings, & let postmaster decide action. > > The only other option I can think of is to personaly extend my > procmail filter on my own questions@ incoming stream, to delete all > postings from listed individuals. > Many others could do similar, but massive inefficiency, & > newbies couldn't, & the noise on the raw unfiltered list & > in web achives would damage FreeBSD. > while subscription is good idea, as well as your personal blacklist, your other proposition would require strict political compatibility with those who would decide about who cannot post.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201636090.1476>