Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:03:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Christopher Chin <cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/95956: 128-bit Message-ID: <20060417135646.J91418@malcolm.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <200604171950.k3HJo0TA076716@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200604171950.k3HJo0TA076716@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Today at 19:50 (-0000), Mark Linimon wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:00 GMT > From: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> > To: cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU, linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: bin/95956: 128-bit > > Synopsis: 128-bit > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: linimon > State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 17 19:49:11 UTC 2006 > State-Changed-Why: > The 108-bit key is understood to be the correct behavior. Hmmm... turns out that a better answer would have been for me to (re-)read the 6-0 Release Notes... particularly section 2.2.2.2. Network Interface Support. Apparently: "Note in particular that WEP now requires the wlan_wep module to be loaded (or compiled) into the kernel." All fine and good... but I'd be surprised if others don't trip on this as well when 6.x gets more usage. Oh... Sorry about the lame subject line. I hit the submit button before going back and "fixing" the Subject. Thanks, - Christopher ======================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060417135646.J91418>