Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:07:40 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is there a reason that da should *not* drive type STORAGE ARRAY Message-ID: <20020416080740.A17100@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204151439290.62590-100000@beppo>; from mjacob@feral.com on Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:41:26PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204151439290.62590-100000@beppo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:41:26PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Whilst dorking with an HP XP-512 storage arrage array on Fibre Channel, I > found that it defaults to type STORAGE ARRAY (not DIRECT ACCESS). However, the > DIRECT ACCESS commands work fine. > > Is there a reason why da(4) should *not* drive devices of type STORAGE ARRAY? Not having had my hands on a XP512 I can tell you that the Compaq arrays (HSG80 in SCSI-3 mode or the new HSV110) use type STORAGE ARRAY for LUN0 which is the LUN the config tools and some OS-es talk for configuration of the box. All LUNs !=0 are type DIRECT ACCESS. W/ -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020416080740.A17100>