Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 20:18:25 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: peter@netplex.com.au Cc: ache@nagual.pp.ru, peter@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-usrsbin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/mtree create.c misc.c mtree.8 mtree.c mtree.h verify.c Message-ID: <199806070318.UAA09146@bubble.didi.com> In-Reply-To: <199806051513.XAA01847@spinner.netplex.com.au> (message from Peter Wemm on Fri, 05 Jun 1998 23:13:34 %2B0800)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > I don't care about /usr/src and /usr/obj permissions at all, so "nochange"
* > is better for them.
*
* Also, I note that we don't have a /usr/ports entry there at all. Perhaps
* we should have a "ports nochange" entry too?
Actually, I never understood why /usr/src has to be there. People who
want the source can surely create the directory by themselves, same
for /usr/ports.
* (bsd.port.mk also refers to
* /usr/ports explicitly.)
I don't think /usr/ports is necessary for a system to function. The
definition in bsd.port.mk is just a default. You can very well have
it elsewhere. The same could be said for /usr/local, now that
bsd.port.mk creates ${PREFIX} before running mtree on BSD.local.dist.
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806070318.UAA09146>