Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:17:32 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with "using namespace std;" Message-ID: <20020831221732.GA98460@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3D713DD0.8FFA608A@mindspring.com> References: <20020828021006.D1412@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <3D6C1F76.30B458A5@mindspring.com> <20020828063614.GA88426@dragon.nuxi.com> <3D713DD0.8FFA608A@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:06:08PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > In general, though, the answer is that "3.1 sucks and 2.9x > > > does not". 8-). > > > > Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience. > > > > > Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy > > > non-maintenance release level GCC; alternately, wait for 3.3. > > > > What in the world are you trying to say?? > > "non-maintenance release"??? Why do you think 3.2 is buggy?? > > Because rather than leaving it alone for a while, they are already > planning a 3.3. 8-). > > And comments on this list to that effect. I don't follow. The GCC group branches previous to a release and makes an initial + point releases from it. How is this different from FreeBSD? (other than they branch much before the .0 release and we don't). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020831221732.GA98460>