Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:21:31 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Message-ID: <20121014152131.GA57720@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <1350202187139-5751862.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com> <1350153522261-5751733.post@n5.nabble.com> <5079DCCE.4020901@FreeBSD.org> <1350202187139-5751862.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:09:47AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: > > "* Scheduler rewrite" > > They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's > too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in > FreeBSD after all this time. > 'loathe' appears to be an interesting choice of word. I do not loathe ULE, but I also do not use ULE. Why? Because in my testing with my workloads, I found ULE to perform poorly in comparison to 4BSD. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121014152131.GA57720>