Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 12:19:57 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: terry@safetynet.net (Terry Lambert) Cc: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au, toor@dyson.iquest.net, sos@FreeBSD.org, coredump@nervosa.com, mmead@Glock.COM, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -current and accelx Message-ID: <199603161919.MAA17685@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199603160228.TAA14695@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Mar 15, 96 07:28:53 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> When the parent forks, and there is mapped memory, unless the MAP_INHERIT > flag is present, the child process should lose the mapping to the address > space, in all cases. Ugh. This is a screwup on my part. It should say "execs", not "forks". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603161919.MAA17685>