Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:45 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang Message-ID: <31131280.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <31131269.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <4D7943B1.1030604@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTinEXZgvnRxnfWA8PvUuDOFp36oFCwa34nenYWWq@mail.gmail.com> <31131269.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Core i7 based procesors run slower with -march=core2 (new option) on the system compiler than with -march=nocona" Sorry for double mail, isn't CPUTYPE=core2 just alias to nocona with base compiler? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark%3A-gcc-base-vs.-gcc-ports-vs.-clang-tp31119986p31131280.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31131280.post>