Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 17:03:48 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so Message-ID: <199801060603.RAA30386@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>> No. LINT is suppose to have the minimal number of entries to give an >> instance of each type. Only a few bogus entries breake this rule (grep >> for [a-z]1). > >But what about showing also different instance/flag combinations? I >don't see how it hurts to do that as separate entries if the >alternative is to muddy a single entry to the point of confusion. OK, but the proposed change just copied lines from GENERIC to give uninteresting differences in the port, irq and disable flag. Brucehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801060603.RAA30386>