Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 01:52:55 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS Message-ID: <200007160752.BAA52125@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2000 00:49:43 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007160046160.9967-100000@gateway.posi.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007160046160.9967-100000@gateway.posi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007160046160.9967-100000@gateway.posi.net> Kelly Yancey writes: : I didn't mean when you mounted the jail, but rather when you mounted the : filesystem in question (i.e. /dev or /proc). The mount flag would be used to : indicate that is mount is to transcend jails. In other words, when building a : list of the current mount points inside a jail, mount with this flag would : always be included. It is arguably a hack, but I don't see why it wouldn't : work. You certainly don't want to do that for /dev in jails. The whole point of jails is that you can give them access to a small subset of devices that are "safe". Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007160752.BAA52125>