Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:27:45 +0200 From: Erik Winge <erik.winge@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_ural in 6.0-BETA4/7.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <4cf221cc05090800277c0d61b2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4cf221cc050907095139f6058b@mail.gmail.com> References: <4cf221cc050718035328cfb071@mail.gmail.com> <05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu> <4cf221cc05090613208a72a08@mail.gmail.com> <2300.193.68.33.1.1126075625.squirrel@193.68.33.1> <4cf221cc050907095139f6058b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 9/7/05, Erik Winge <erik.winge@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/7/05, =C1d=E1m Szilveszter <adamsz@mailpont.hu> wrote: > > I no longer see this problem on a 7.0-CURRENT box with a kernel+ world > > from 26th August. I can leave the box up for a day and idle for hours, = the > > connection stays. I still use the ral(4) cards referenced in the quote. > > > > Perhaps something missing from 6.0-BETA? >=20 > As far as I can tell, if_ural.c in RELENG_6 is now up-to-date with > 7.0-CURRENT. Perhaps this means the fault lies somewhere else? >=20 > I guess perhaps i should give 7.0-CURRENT a try. Ok, I have updated to 7.0-CURRENT, and still have this problem. Perhaps it has been fixed in ral, but not in ural? I'm a bit confused :) Regards, Erik Winge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4cf221cc05090800277c0d61b2>