Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:07:10 -0800
From:      "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>
To:        "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        "Daniel Eischen" <deischen@freebsd.org>, "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: kernel thread as real threads..
Message-ID:  <43D142EE.9080601@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201443570.1773-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

Scott Long wrote:

> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or
>>> kernel visible way?  Is this something that is really all that
>>> important?
>>
>>
>>
>> Only in a non-portable way.  See pthread_set_name_np(3).
>>
>
> Well, for the time being, I can't see why we can't specifically
> name kthreads and use the process name for user threads.


that's what happens with my patches already..

>
> Scott
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D142EE.9080601>