Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:57:52 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> To: Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem Splitting Branches with Procmail Message-ID: <20011204145752.B75379@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20011203174307.GA79113@sploo.aagh.net> References: <20011203022809.D31748@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011203174307.GA79113@sploo.aagh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 05:43:08PM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Crist J . Clark (cjc@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>
> > The "X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch:" header is specifically there for this use,
> > so I assume some people are using it? Is there a way to configure
> > procmail(1) to figure this out and get replies in the same box with
> > the original message? I can think of some very elaborate ways to try
> > to do this, but I don't like them. Any procmail wizards have come nice
> > recipes for this?
>
> The cleanest solution for this imo is to have multiple lists - one for
> each branch, with cvs-all subscribed to all messages (bit like zsh,
> where it's zsh-announce -> zsh-users -> zsh-workers). Standard ml
> filters would work then.
What about '+' subaddressing.
Say the logs are send to cvs-all+${branchname}@freebsd.org while the
envelope userpart is striped after the first '+'.
That way reactions automaticaly includes the branchname and everyone
can filter.
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011204145752.B75379>