Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:13:06 +0100 From: Igor Pokrovsky <igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr> To: osa@freebsd.org.ru Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with getting through firewall using CVSup Message-ID: <3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD@cnrm.meteo.fr> References: <200302281442.h1SEg0RV042490@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151033.GE424@freebsd.org.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > Sergey Osokin wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there any way to make it work? > > > > > To fool firewall? > > > > > > > > Yes, looks like a bad/fool/stupid firewall administriva. > > > > > > I know, there are lots of companies that permit any inside > > > initiated TCP connection. I'd call this stupid if not > > > explicitly decided upon and documented. > > Yes. I agree, maybe this is a good policy. And moreover > > I think that they closed port 5999 on firewall because > > of my activities :-) Perhaps they thought that I'm trying > > do something, which will break their security. Maybe because > > port number is not very popular :-) > > > > > And last - maybe they are running a strict application level > > > gateway like Gauntlet or Sidewinder? If this is the case the > > > admin must define a custom TCP proxy for CVSup, first. > > No. Fortunatly. > > Last idea is use CTM. AFAIK your system administrator think > that 25 port is much more popular for you and other users :-) It seems to me that yes. But can I get whole repository with CTM, as I did with cvsup? -- Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD>