Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:41:40 -0700
From:      pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com>
To:        Lars Eighner <luvbeastie@larseighner.com>
Cc:        Jonathan McKeown <j.mckeown@ru.ac.za>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com
Subject:   Re: Why is sendmail is part of the system and not a package?
Message-ID:  <57d710000910271741p7429d4feh150ecbe6cddd3d2e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091027191626.T92033@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>
References:  <4AE5F897.3000103@rawbw.com> <200910270916.31033.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20091027021723.M88213@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <b79ecaef0910270216q14421922w4acf62103322c16a@mail.gmail.com> <20091027142502.Q91143@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <b79ecaef0910271341y1aea61a6pd7bcd6c96855da64@mail.gmail.com> <20091027191626.T92033@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Lars Eighner
<luvbeastie@larseighner.com> wrote:

>> You guessed wrong.
>>
>> We use m4, which cuts out most of the crap that you had to write into
>> sendmail.cf. You write sendmail.mc and compile it. Sendmail.mc on my
>> system is less than 50 lines long, including comments.
>>
>> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/intro.html
>
> That's as poorly documented and incomprehensible as .cf by hand. =A0What =
is
> your interest in sendmail? =A0Are you connected with it in someway? =A0Su=
rely,
> yours could not be the opinion of someone who doesn't get a piece of
> O'Reilly's royalties. =A0It's the same old crap, give the software away, =
sell
> the documentation.
>

well shit man - Eric's actually a super nice guy and has made some
major contributions to computing so I reckon he deserves *some*
respect for the work he's done on sendmail.

and frankly I find it easier to setup a SMART_HOST in my .m4 and dist
out my resulting configs to my servers in my production clusters.  I
also have the added benefit that i know sendmail is being tracked as
part of the base system so it makes it easier for me to monitor
patches w/o having to track ports.

For more complex systems (my relay for example) - sure I use postfix,
and freebsd makes this quite easy to do as well.  if you don't want to
use sendmail on your machines it's easy - just don't use it.

-pete


--=20
pete wright
www.nycbug.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57d710000910271741p7429d4feh150ecbe6cddd3d2e>