Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:46:27 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How about finally replacing GNATS? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkNsUgu87Tv02kL8UETRGqxDLtEsHtMpjCAZFtodk=SSA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGE5yCq1KBbDr61P152QuQ2Qq=1KQqEC=JqpVdeTw2k=Gq=58g@mail.gmail.com> References: <4E593932.8060303@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgnCPcisTFn37VtYsvHhttQvc1=DxXLuqq7kScJG3UL=cA@mail.gmail.com> <C76EF9E9-2F9A-4F49-9ADE-1C7074510BC4@cederstrand.dk> <86sj928vks.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4FB39F66-0434-43F1-9705-3C81CDF2A25F@cederstrand.dk> <86ehkm8s5v.fsf@ds4.des.no> <0EF669C7-0ED4-4BD4-9170-C49A7CA91603@cederstrand.dk> <20121025193115.GD40357@in-addr.com> <CAF6rxgmeJ9Kf-W3hEZwH2qCxoWve0Hqd27aYC=Y4wACyUm8%2BLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCq_SrvcU1FzPN2U1=s%2BGahVRBOAhE6dy8KAwcG_-TDs%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <20121030082900.GH3309@server.rulingia.com> <35AB4227-2053-4678-BE71-576B01E48FE1@cederstrand.dk> <CAJ-VmomWgbQyz-3x9Qsn9woBpEP1P4g7tWGWz53ZMQCPj4y-sw@mail.gmail.com> <038C004A-6177-472D-A328-90830E04F640@cederstrand.dk> <CAGE5yCq1KBbDr61P152QuQ2Qq=1KQqEC=JqpVdeTw2k=Gq=58g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 October 2012 13:39, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> wrote: > [..] >> I'm not suggesting send-pr should go. I even provided a script to keep using it with Bugzilla. I'm just curious what's so great about it in 2012. Offline is a good argument, and HTTP sucks at offline. > > But I am. ... There are good reasons to keep send-pr and good reasons to get rid of it. We are not yet at the stage where it even makes sense to discuss this. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkNsUgu87Tv02kL8UETRGqxDLtEsHtMpjCAZFtodk=SSA>