Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:34:55 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227536 - in head: release share/man/man7 Message-ID: <AD227A51-FE06-4D9F-B1F2-D14B3EA08A32@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org> <20111116.232828.343708041526200614.nyan@FreeBSD.org> <4EC3D40A.5040204@freebsd.org> <1321457050.78238.10.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl> <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? >>>=20 >>> Can't we use one if they are equal? >>=20 >> I'd prefer consistency. [...] >=20 > But it looks so plain stupid! I've had someone ask me what amd64-amd64 meant when I pointed them as = the RC announcement. I replied that I had no idea and suggested that = possibly RE had been handed over to the department of redundancy = department. Having read this thread, I can now confidently say... that = I still have no idea. But (with my compiler-writer hat on) please tell me that we're not = inventing yet another incompatible form of target triple. We have at = least twice as many as we need already... David=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD227A51-FE06-4D9F-B1F2-D14B3EA08A32>