Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:46:41 +1030 From: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, Chris H <bsd-lists@1command.com> Cc: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Erich Dollansky <erich@alogt.com> Subject: Re: BETA4: fortune -o gone? Message-ID: <52A2AF39.7090006@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <20131205105357.GU48919@FreeBSD.org> References: <20131205090208.4cdba36b@X220.ovitrap.com> <20131205010722.GE44739@glenbarber.us> <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131205105357.GU48919@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/12/2013 21:23, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:58:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > C> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:02:08AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > C> >> I think that since I installed BETA1 the 'offensive' fortunes are gone? > C> >> I did a fresh install with a BETA1 CD and upgraded recently to BETA4. > C> > > C> > Yes, they were (finally) removed with extreme prejudice. > C> > C> Nobody likes a good BikeShed. But _really_? > C> Is FreeBSD going "PC" (Politically Correct)? > C> Looks like a sign of weakness. :( > > FreeBSD isn't going politically correct. The fortunes-o was removed > to save invaluable time, that developers used to spend discussing > changes to the file. > so fortunes-o contained inappropriate material that was worth arguing about but murphy-o isn't - guess it's too short to argue over? Now limerick and gerrold.limerick contains material that some would find offensive, yet they are just fine where they are....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52A2AF39.7090006>