Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:09:27 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: turning off malloc's AJ by default Message-ID: <200203240009.g2O09RX72516@apollo.backplane.com> References: <20020323155500.A18666@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If I remember correctly, it was the plan all along that releases would
not have AJ turned on by default.
The real question is: should the patch stay in after the release is
rolled? Has the AJ default outlived its usefulness in general?
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
:The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied.
:If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not useful (by being removed from the
:DP), it sounds like we should just turn it off.
:
:Unless there is strong objection, I plan on committing this.
:
:Index: malloc.c
:===================================================================
:RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c,v
:retrieving revision 1.66
:diff -u -u -1 -r1.66 malloc.c
:--- malloc.c 22 Mar 2002 21:53:10 -0000 1.66
:+++ malloc.c 23 Mar 2002 23:52:40 -0000
:@@ -223,3 +223,3 @@
: /* Abort(), user doesn't handle problems. */
:-static int malloc_abort = 1;
:+static int malloc_abort;
:
:@@ -244,3 +244,3 @@
: /* junk fill ? */
:-static int malloc_junk = 1;
:+static int malloc_junk;
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203240009.g2O09RX72516>
