Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 18:10:41 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul <pauld@mail.dotcom.fr> To: Nathan Schuler <nschuler@sparrow.sanasys.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atapi Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970530180936.103B-100000@dolphin.psd> In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19970530004324.006d3108@sparrow.sanasys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 1997, Nathan Schuler wrote: >>Linux did the best, is that true? (there's a list below, I couldn't find >>FreeBSD in it, but BSDI?!) > >Not sure. But as for file system performance, nothing beats the BSD UNIX's. And also not the FreeBSD UNIX's? :-) Is that based on the same? >This list was most likely setup for corporate users. I use BSDI 3.0 and >BSDI 2.1 in my office. Erhm... That's the official BSD distrib or? What are the main differences with FreeBSD? >>OS put to /dev/null get to /dev/null Webstone throughput >>without Router 870 kbyte/s 910 kbyte/s 6.97 Mbit/s >>SCO OpenServer 430 460 3.51 >>BSDI OS 2.1 580 620 4.76 >>Linux 2.0.18 620 630 4.77 >>NT Server 4.0 580 600 4.85 >>Intranetware 4.11 540 580 4.74 -- Paul Dekkers (psd@worldaccess.nl or psd@dds.nl) N.E.V - Nescio Ergo Valeo Pentiums melt in your PC, not in your hand
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.95.970530180936.103B-100000>