Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:24:58 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <peter@bsdly.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing spam fight Message-ID: <200701260924.59674.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> References: <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <200701250828.50540.joao@matik.com.br> <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> writes: > > all this methods are certainly useless, stay calm ok > > I fully sympathize with your need to rant, but in this context most of > what you say is really quite beside the point. Please read what the > material at the links provided actually says. > the articles you linked show how to implement pf like I said, for my understandings firewall implemention for spam fighting = is=20 wrong because you reject the message unless you are the man of a corporate network you do have *NO* right to dec= ide=20 which message your users receive or not. May be some *WANT* viagra offers a= nd=20 others *WANT* a bigger penis so the only correct decision is to filter spam and put it into a spam folde= r=20 where the user can review it and decide by his own if want it or not but may be, to change your opinion, you need to loose a case being=20 responsible for some having a small penis and pay him his losses hihihihi,= =20 100k/inch or something hihihi laugh with me and have a good day :) =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701260924.59674.joao>