Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:46:23 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfree86@lists.csociety.org Subject: Re: FW: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile Makefile.man pkg-plist pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 ports/x11/XFree86-4/files patch-2 patch-c patch-c2 patch-d patch-f patch-i810 patch-j patch-k patch-mouse patch-r128 patch-r128dri patch-r128xmesa patch-shm Message-ID: <3C9619DF.C5691B4B@FreeBSD.org> References: <20020316235108.GE53073@squall.waterspout.com> <20020318183503.C10603@straylight.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:51:08PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > With this commit, we have XFree86 4.2.0 in our ports tree. > > Please report problems to me asap. I am doing a clean checkout > > on another machine and running another test to catch any mistakes > > that I might have made at commit time. > > Would it be a very Bad Thing(tm) if the meta-port pulled in > the Cyrillic fonts, too? Yes, I do realize that those may > be installed as easily as a 'make install', or as a pkg_add -r, > but still - is there a good reason that this is the only font set > of all those provided in x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font* that is not > installed by default? :) I don't think it would take up too much > disk space or anything, and it would certainly be convenient for > Slavic FreeBSD users to have it pulled in, too :) I agree with Peter, especially considering that Cyrillic fonts was distributed with XFree86 megaport since beginning of the time. We shouldn't not break POLA. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C9619DF.C5691B4B>