Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:49:02 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@linux.gr> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linking basesystem with additional libraries. Message-ID: <20051125034902.GA16834@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20051124193052.GU1006@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20051121162544.GB94958@freebsd.czest.pl> <20051124193052.GU1006@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-11-24 20:30, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> wrote: > > Is there any reason why we couldn't have LDADD honored in "buildworld" > > process? If there are no negative implications, I volunteer to do the > > work. I'd find it really useful. > > Yes, I'm curious, but could you explain in what way it would be useful ? I'd be interested too. I think the main reason why this would NOT be a good idea is that changing an external library to a newer version can break the buildworld/installworld process in unexpected ways
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051125034902.GA16834>