Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:16:39 -0500 From: Astrodog <astrodog@gmail.com> To: "Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lockf in installworld -- not a good idea Message-ID: <2fd864e0609290816v7692e678vcca8ff89d24bbdac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060929.091414.74722768.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20060929134332.GD4776@rambler-co.ru> <20060929144738.W70454@fledge.watson.org> <2fd864e0609290707t7e7d6e17g61a09ff5aa10ff3f@mail.gmail.com> <20060929.091414.74722768.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/29/06, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > > For what its worth.... I'd go with just stopping support for -j in > > installworld, even if things are CPU bound. > > installworld should *NEVER* be done -j. Ever. That wasn't part of > the installworld bargin when it was started. There's no point to it > at all. As such, any support to make it work should be removed with > extreme prejustice. Why on earth would you want to do installworld > -j? That's kinda my thought. --- Harrison
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2fd864e0609290816v7692e678vcca8ff89d24bbdac>