Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:02:48 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: sam@wa4phy.async.com (S.W. Drinkard) Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X required for doscmd? Message-ID: <199609090132.LAA26166@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199609072105.RAA00194@wa4phy.async.com> from "S.W. Drinkard" at Sep 7, 96 05:05:21 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
S.W. Drinkard stands accused of saying: > > Looking at the last few notes about doscmd, I kinda gather that X is > required for use. Is that the case, or does it work without X? X is required for 'fullscreen' emulation. Alexy just posted some diffs that will let you compile doscmd without needing X installed, but bear in mind that any program that attempts BIOS screen output will die. > -sam- -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609090132.LAA26166>