Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:40:19 +0000
From:      Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Timo Rossi <trossi@co.jyu.fi>, small@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New approach to picobsd
Message-ID:  <l03130300b4b3032bdc75@[194.32.164.2]>
In-Reply-To: <20000125103358.U2643@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
References:  <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi>; from trossi@co.jyu.fi on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:20:24PM %2B0200 <3888D5CF.329989@achtung.com> <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:33 +0800 25/1/00, Greg Lehey wrote:
>[...]
>Unfortunately, the current PicoBSD system is oriented towards
>floppies.  This has the great disadvantage, at least in the current
>implementation, that each crunched executable repeats the library
>contents.  For a flash memory system it would make more sense to have
>a single executable...

Um, that's what the current PicoBSD system does?

>...which might be larger than a single floppy.


--
Bob Bishop              (0118) 977 4017  international code +44 118
rb@gid.co.uk        fax (0118) 989 4254  between 0800 and 1800 UK




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03130300b4b3032bdc75>