Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 23:28:11 +0000 (UTC) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <97uj2b$2k3$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <20010303091958.A68223@spawn.nectar.com> <200103031650.f23GoWS12086@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> wrote: > I can see a problem with replacing ash with ksh. [...] I don't agree, but I don't want to discuss that level of detail yet. > If we are going to import ksh93 into the source tree, which I think is > a good thing, Considering the AT&T license, is this even an option? The actual license text is impenetrable for me, but here are some excerpts from <URL:http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/download/faq.license.html>: ... | 5. Can I modify the source and distribute it to someone else? | | Yes, but you need to package the modifications separately, usually as a | patch file. ... | 7. Can I give the original source package to someone else? | | You can, provided that the person you give it to has agreed to the | license. The person does not have to physically sign the license, but | they must affirmatively agree to the same license agreement. We have | enclosed this agreement with the package. ... There is also a termination clause. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?97uj2b$2k3$1>