Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 02:03:04 -0300 From: Federico Caminiti <demian.fc@gmail.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-translators@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translations wiki page. Message-ID: <CAGVyxZE858S10OPp4QZOZhCM2Bip=rv3CLNnY3%2B1LrqC5s6XQg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1603201953280.8954@wonkity.com> References: <CAGVyxZGPPfnUv3mEjbwcZ2oCN6dDZ-SJbYwWUyaqPT8sueCsZw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1603201953280.8954@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Great! I'll see if I can take a look at it later this week. 2016-03-20 23:10 GMT-03:00 Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016, Federico Caminiti wrote: > > Since a few users have expressed an interest in translating things >> recently, I was wondering if someone could create a page on the wiki so >> that we can coordinate efforts. My idea was to have a list of all of the >> documents in the doc tree with three columns: "Document", "Status" and >> "Taken by". The first columns would show the name of the document to >> translate, the second the status (translated, needs updating, not >> translated, etc...) and the third the person who's currently working on it >> (if any). >> >> I think it would be useful because someone looking for a document to >> translate wouldn't overlap with existing efforts and It would be a >> reliable >> guide to the status of the documentation. >> > > Such a table would need to updated manually. Maybe we can use the > existing systems to generate that information automatically. > > In http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/translation/ are the materials for the > "Improving the FreeBSD Translation Tools" presentation I gave at AsiaBSDCon > last week, and will be giving at BSDCan in June. > > There is a docdates.sh script there which queries the doc repository for > translations. We can already add MAINTAINER variables to the translation > Makefiles. That script is 90% of the way to showing the information on how > recently a translation has been updated and who is maintaining it. > > Then we would not need to manually maintain a table with that information. > > As shell scripts go, I'd say it is less terrible than many, and probably > not too hard to modify. But I don't know when I'd be able to work on it > myself, and help is welcome with that. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGVyxZE858S10OPp4QZOZhCM2Bip=rv3CLNnY3%2B1LrqC5s6XQg>