Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:10:41 -0600 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Benjamin Close" <linux@senet.com.au>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ICH2-M IDE controller Message-ID: <01da01c0b4fa$b368fe00$931576d8@inethouston.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103251002210.594-200000@bytes4u.nodomain.yet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think there are a few chips like that, that cannot do ATA100, but only vaguely remember hearing about it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Close" <linux@senet.com.au> To: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 6:49 PM Subject: ICH2-M IDE controller > Hi All, > Is anyone looking at supporting the Intel ICH2-M IDE controller? > This controller is basically the same as the ICH2 controller except it has > extra powermanagment features as it's the for portable computers (hence > the M=mobile). I'm currently using the attached patch which runs > flawlessly on my laptop. However, I'm just an amature code hacker and > hence can't guarentee I haven't missed something between the chipsets. > > The other question I have is why in ata-dma.c is there the fall through to > the ICH chipset? It seems to prevent any drive actually using ATA100/UDMA5 > features. > > Cheers, > -- > * Benjamin Close > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01da01c0b4fa$b368fe00$931576d8>