Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:06:15 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. Message-ID: <199703171406.PAA04521@ravenock.cybercity.dk> In-Reply-To: <l03010d00af52e59348d3@[208.2.87.4]> from Richard Wackerbarth at "Mar 17, 97 06:28:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Richard Wackerbarth who wrote:
> joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) replies:
>
> >As mika ruohotie wrote:
> >
> >> while i post, to me it sounds a nice idea to twiddle the naming like it
> >> was suggested...
> >>
> >> 2.1.x stable
> >> 2.2.x current
> >> 3.0.x future (experimental?)
> >
> >Well, we've been referring to the experimental stuff as -current for
> >all the time. I'm afraid it's simply too late switching paradigms
> >now, since it would confuse the hell out of the users.
>
> I can also argue that all 2.2 discussion has always been on "current"
> and never on "stable". Rather than move the 2.2 discussion, we could
> equally move the 3.0 discussion.
Well, actually it is quite easy:
2.1.X dead
2.2.X stable
3.x.x current
Thats it, like it or not :)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team
Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703171406.PAA04521>